🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the perfect choice for a bold scary movie focused on Jesus Christ, though not for the causes some fans might assume. Truthfully, Cage doesn't actually play Jesus in the new film: his character is credited merely as a craftsman. The actor is cast as the Joseph within this tale, working to keep his beliefs as the teenage character (portrayed by Noah Jupe), his adolescent adopted son, begins to exhibit supernatural abilities. The explanation it’s difficult to imagine any other major actor taking this character is that while the role becomes burdened with various difficulties, the actor seems almost touchingly convinced that the gloomy, grim small film is worth his time.

The Actor's Recent Film Selections

Cage has using his time more judiciously recently. He still stars in more films than most regular audiences will ever see — for example, are you aware that the man has filmed three different Westerns in the past three years? — but he also adds high-profile independent films for example one recent hit, another notable movie, and Longlegs. The Carpenter’s Son seems like one of those, because it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and approaches a campy-sounding description in a earnest manner.

Movie's Storyline and Handling

Unfortunately, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan does not reward that serious attention. The film starts from a compellingly nomadic place, positioned as drawing from an unknown scripture regarding the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their child travel constantly, fearful of faith-based hostility or suspicion regarding their son's strange powers. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. It goes on when evil influences attack them where they currently live, initiating with that familiar Biblical temptation for The Boy.

Occasionally, this production mirrors an Exorcist-style horror film, except that none of the main figures are explicitly taken over. Instead, they become progressively isolated from one another, as these forces infect a local young woman (the actress, listed as “The Stranger”) that The Boy forms a relationship with, and provides each character disturbing images of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter especially fights with his role in this story, at times berating the son he doesn't completely grasp.

Debate and Care

The content is likely to court controversy, and Nathan treats it with a lot of delicacy — excessive, perhaps. The notion of a adolescent facing his destined offering and tempted by dark influences is indeed frightening, but Nathan might be hesitant regarding seeming gratuitous and keen to telegraph his goals, therefore he regularly withdraws to gloomily threatening filming. The roles brood incessantly — the singer-actress, who demonstrated notable talent in another movie, interestingly — yields her performance to her character's costume, sometimes broken up by some gruesome scary visuals.

Cage's Acting and Film's Flaws

At the same time, the actor flirts with exactly the kind of overacting that his more snickering appreciators may desire. An instance (featured) in previews where he loses control and shouts “I’ve lost my faith!” When this sort of dramatic explosion is included in your Jesus-themed horror movie, possibly a more boldly ridiculous approach would be more effective of his eagerness to go over the top if needed. Instead, The Carpenter’s Son is closer to the less successful direct-to-video movies Cage made over the last decade — excluding the campy action films but rather the narrative films and ghost stories that typically appear interesting, and often contain a few choice actor's highlights, but finally come across like, indeed, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Truthfully, several of these, though not as grand, were more entertaining as a whole. This is when I have to break my usual practice, not spiritual but career-related: Years back, a beloved editor convinced me to banish words like “boring” or “dull” from my reviewing language. These phrases communicate minimal but a personal and broadly stated impatience, withdrawing from the duty of vividly conveying the intellectual and feeling of viewing a specific film. It’s difficult to communicate tedium without sounding boring yourself. It's equally vague as labeling a movie “engaging.” “Explain further,” in other words.

However, I admit, I was bored throughout The Carpenter’s Son. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a religious style of boredom, not due to this movie is lecturing, but since it demands a type of patient acceptance to watch it. Eventually in the beginning, this feature locks into a repetitive rhythm of simmering distress, and does not